Efficacy of CTPV for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Assessment: Comparison with Endoscopy in Cirrhotic Patients with Gastroesophageal Varices

3Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background and Aims. Computed tomography portal venography (CTPV) shows potential in detecting varices that need treatment and their drainage pathways. However, its agreement with endoscopy requires further study. We investigated the feasibility of CTPV as an alternative tool to endoscopy in screening gastroesophageal varices (GEVs) and developed a CTPV-based model to provide a less invasive assessment of endotherapy for cirrhotic patients with GEVs. Methods. The study included 33 cirrhotic patients with a recent history of variceal hemorrhage. The presence, grade, and classification of GEVs on endoscopy and CTPV were compared (kappa test). Twenty-four patients were treated endoscopically, including 12 for esophageal varices (EVs), 8 for gastric varices (GVs), and 4 for GEVs. Treatment efficacies were assessed with the newly developed CTPV-based method at 1 week and 1 month after treatment. Efficiency evaluated by CTPV and endoscopy was compared by Fisher's exact test to determine whether CTPV is efficient in the assessment of endotherapy efficacy. Results. For the screening and grading/classification of EVs and GVs, substantial agreement (EV kappa: 0.63 and 0.68; GV kappa: 0.62 and 0.75, respectively) was noted between endoscopy and CTPV. The therapeutic efficacy of EVs was higher when assessed by CTPV than when evaluated by endoscopy (37.50% vs. 12.50% at 1 week postoperation, P=0.22; 62.50% vs. 25.00% at 1 month postoperation, P=0.07), but without statistical significance. The same trend was also found in the assessment of therapeutic efficacy for GVs (25.00% vs. 16.67% at 1 week postoperation, P=1; 58.33% vs. 41.67% at 1 month postoperation, P=0.68). Conclusion. CTPV is comparable to endoscopy in the detection of GEVs and in the evaluation of endotherapy efficacy, which suggests that it could be a less invasive alternative for endoscopy in cirrhotic patients with GEVs needing treatment.

References Powered by Scopus

Non-invasive evaluation of portal hypertension using ultrasound elastography

226Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Long-term follow-up of gastric variceal sclerotherapy: An eleven-year experience

190Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and management of hypersensitivity reactions to contrast media

130Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Hemodynamic effect through a novel endoscopic intervention in management of varices and hypersplenism (with video)

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

EUS-guided coil placement and cyanoacrylate glue injection for gastric variceal bleeding with obvious spontaneous portosystemic shunts

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Feasibility of computed tomography portal venography in the preoperative evaluation of emergent TIPS creation for cirrhotic patients with acute variceal bleeding

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cui, Z., Yang, H., Jin, X., Jiang, H., Qi, W., Feng, W., & Feng, Z. (2020). Efficacy of CTPV for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Assessment: Comparison with Endoscopy in Cirrhotic Patients with Gastroesophageal Varices. Gastroenterology Research and Practice, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6268570

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 1

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 1

33%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

33%

Arts and Humanities 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free