CTONG 1103: Erlotinib versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin as neo-adjuvant treatment for stage IIIA-N2 EGFR-mutation non-small cell lung cancer (EMERGING): A randomised study

  • Zhong W
  • Wu Y
  • Chen K
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Cisplatin-based doublet chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment for IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) give patients 5% survival benefit. EGFRTKIs have been proved to prolong PFS of advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC. CTONG1104 trial shown adjuvant gefitinib could improve 10 months (disease free survival) DFS than chemotherapy in N1/N2 resected NSCLC. It raises the possibility that EGFR-TKIs may play a beneficial role in the neoadjuvant setting. We conducted this randomized trial to compare the efficacy of erlotinib (E) and gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) as neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatment. Methods: Eligible patients with N2 disease were randomly assigned in 1:1 ratio to E group for 42 days as neoadjuvant therapy and then for 12 months after surgery or GC group for 2 cycles neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 2 cycles after complete resection. The primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR). secondary endpoints included downstaging rates of pathological lymph nodes, pathological complete response (pCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and tolerability. Results: A total of 386 patients from 17 centers were screened, 72 were randomized and included in the intention-to-treat population. The ORR for neoadjuvant E versus GC was 54.1% (95% CI, 37.2% to 70.9%) vs 34.3% (95% CI, 17.7% to 50.8%) (OR 2.26; 95% CI, 0-87-5.84; p=0-092). After neoadjuvant therapy, 31 patients (83-8%) in the E group and 24 (68-6%) in the GC group underwent surgery. Overall, lymph node downstaging occurred in 13% in the E and 4-2% in the GC group. The major pathological response (MPR) occurred in 3 of 28 patients (10.7%) in the E and no MPR (0/22) in the GC group. Median PFS was significantly longer with E (21-5months; 95% CI, 19-3- 23-6) versus GC (11-9 months; 95% CI, 9-1-14-7; HR 0-42; 95% CI, 0-23-0-76; p=0-003), whereas OS data was immature. The incidence of grade 3/4 toxicities was lower in the E group (0%) than that in the GC group (29-4%). No unexpected AEs were found. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant/adjuvant erlotinib improved ORR, and significantly prolonged PFS compared with GC chemotherapy in patients with stage IIIA-N2 EGFR mutation NSCLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhong, W.-Z., Wu, Y.-L., Chen, K.-N., Chen, C., Gu, C.-D., Wang, Q., … Zhou, Q. (2018). CTONG 1103: Erlotinib versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin as neo-adjuvant treatment for stage IIIA-N2 EGFR-mutation non-small cell lung cancer (EMERGING): A randomised study. Annals of Oncology, 29, viii738. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy424.058

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free