A comparison of traditional and 3D scanning measurement in ear anthropometry

3Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Ear anthropometry is important in physical ergonomics for ear-related products. With various anthropometric methods, comparisons between different measuring techniques have not been sufficiently studied especially for ear dimensions. This study aimed at comparing traditional measurement and 3D scanning method for ear anthropometry, with addressing their usages in practice. For thirty participants, ear length and ear width were measured by the same investigator with two measuring methods. Traditional measurement was directly conducted with a caliper, whereas dimensions using 3D scanning technique were extracted from the point cloud acquired from a structured light scanner. Statistical results showed the differences between traditional and 3D scanning measurement, which can provide empirical evidences of differences between different measuring techniques for ear anthropometry. Additionally, the usages of different methods were discussed so that the proper method can be selected to match specific goals for future research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fu, F., Luximon, A., & Luximon, Y. (2020). A comparison of traditional and 3D scanning measurement in ear anthropometry. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 967, pp. 417–423). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20142-5_42

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free