(Re)constructing reflexivity: A relational constructionist approach

35Citations
Citations of this article
85Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article distinguishes three discourses of reflexivity in relation to human inquiry. One of these arises from a post-modern, relational constructionist perspective which radically re-conceptualizes reflexivity: (a) as a local and co-constructed process oriented towards the question (b) how are we 'going on' together, and therefore paying attention to (c) the realities and relations we are co-creating during the research process and so (d) is concerned with local pragmatic and ethical issues (Gergen & Hosking, 2006; McNamee, 1994) rather than with the quality of truth claims. Regular reflexive dialogues as part of, and directed at, the research process can heighten the local use value of research for all participants and can facilitate new possible realities and relations. © 2010: Dian Marie Hosking, Bettine Pluut, and Nova Southeastern University.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hosking, D. M., & Pluut, B. (2010). (Re)constructing reflexivity: A relational constructionist approach. Qualitative Report, 15(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2010.1140

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free