Decision-making strategies for reperfusion therapies: navigating through stroke trials gaps

2Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Despite there being a robust amount of literature and numerous randomized clinical trials regarding acute ischemic stroke treatment, the trials have not included some frequent controversial situations for which decision-making strategies are an urgent and unmet need in clinical practice. This article tries to summarize the current evidence about some selected situations (mechanical thrombectomy in low ASPECTS, low NIHSS with proximal occlusion, acute basilar occlusion, distal and medium vessel occlusion, among others), make suggestions on how to approach them in clinical practice and show what to expect in acute stroke research in the near future.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pellegrino, M. P., Del Guerra, F. B., & Perissinotti, I. N. (2022). Decision-making strategies for reperfusion therapies: navigating through stroke trials gaps. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, 80, 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X-ANP-2022-S123

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free