Mycophenolic acid agents: is enteric coating the answer?

  • Cooper M
  • Manitpisitkul
  • Lee
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Addition of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to calcineurin-based immunosuppressive therapy has led to a significant improvement in graft survival and reduction of acute rejection in renal transplant recipients. However, in clinical practice, MMF dose reduction, interruption, or discontinuation due to hematological and gastrointestinal (GI) side-effects occurred in up to 50% of the patients. Large retrospective analyses have demonstrated that patients requiring MMF dose manipulation due to adverse events experienced a higher rate of rejection and graft loss. Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) was developed with the goal of improving upper GI side-effects. Here, we review the efficacy and safety of EC-MPS in de novo kidney transplant recipient, and in stable renal transplant patients who were converted from MMF. The changes in GI-related adverse events using patient-reported outcome instruments are also reviewed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cooper, M., Manitpisitkul, & Lee. (2011). Mycophenolic acid agents: is enteric coating the answer? Transplant Research and Risk Management, 45. https://doi.org/10.2147/trrm.s12210

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free