Incremental versus non-incremental rule induction for multicriteria classification

28Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Induction of decision rules within the dominance - based rough set approach to the multicriteria and multiattribute classification is considered. Within this framework, we discuss two algorithms: Glance and an extended version of AllRules. The important characteristics of Glance is that it induces the set of all dominance - based rules in an incremental way. On the other hand, AllRules induces in a non-incremental way the set of all robust rules, i.e. based on objects from the set of learning examples. The main aim of this study is to compare both these algorithms. We experimentally evaluate them on several data sets. The results show that Glance and AllRules are complementary algorithms. The first one works very efficiently on data sets described by a low number of condition attributes and a high number of objects. The other one, conversely, works well on data sets characterized by a high number of attributes and a low number of objects. © Springer-Verlag 2004.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Greco, S., Slowinski, R., Stefanowski, J., & Zurawski, M. (2004). Incremental versus non-incremental rule induction for multicriteria classification. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 3135, 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27778-1_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free