Do Method and Lack of Context Explain Low Stability of Brand Associations? No!

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Scholars report low stability of brand-attribute associations in free choice affirmative binary rating tasks (“yes”-option, ticked or not, indicating whether a brand has a specific attribute or not). A multi-brand meta-analysis by Rungie, Laurent, Rily, Morrison and Roy (2005) reports stability levels of 49% over a period of three months; another by Dolnicar and Rossiter (2008) an average of 53% for 20 brands with a one-week interval between two measurements. Dolnicar and Rossiter (2008) provide a set of recommendations to attain higher levels of stability, for example shorter questionnaires, or sampling only category users and brand aware respondents.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Koll, O., & Kreuzer, M. (2015). Do Method and Lack of Context Explain Low Stability of Brand Associations? No! In Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science (pp. 337–339). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10912-1_115

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free