The influence of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy on mortality in type 1 diabetic patients; 10-year follow-up

8Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim. The aim of our retrospective study was to answer the question if the presence of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) affects mortality in type 1 diabetic patients during a 10-year follow-up. Methods. Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus examined for CAN in 2003 were enrolled in this retrospective study. A total of 278 patients were included and divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of CAN (111 CAN+, 167 CAN-). The group characteristics and outcomes were compared at baseline and after ten years (in 2013). Results. In the follow-up period, a total of 18 patients died; CAN+ (14/111; 12.6%) and CAN- (4/167; 2.4%) (P < 0.001). At baseline, the CAN+ patients were older (47 vs. 33 years; P < 0.001), had longer duration of diabetes (20 vs. 12 years; P < 0.05), had worse glycemic control assessed by HbA1c (73 vs. 68 mmol/mol; P < 0.05), higher systolic (130 vs. 120 mmHg; P < 0.001) and diastolic (80 vs. 70 mmHg; P < 0.01) blood pressure and had more diabetic complications. In our analysis we found the strongest predictor of mortality to be the presence of CAN (P < 0.01) and the blood pressure value at baseline (P < 0.05). Other baseline characteristics, including the duration of diabetes, age and the presence of micro- and macrovascular complications were not significant. The statistical analysis was performed using logistic regression step-wise analysis. Conclusions. During the 10-year follow-up, CAN+ patients had a 5-fold higher mortality rate than CAN- patients. The strongest predictor of mortality was the presence of CAN.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lacigova, S., Brozova, J., Cechurova, D., Tomesova, J., Krcma, M., & Rusavy, Z. (2016). The influence of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy on mortality in type 1 diabetic patients; 10-year follow-up. Biomedical Papers, 160(1), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2015.063

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free