FMEA, HAZID, and ontologies

1Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter is inspired by two sources Trammell and Davis work on a fusion of HazOp and FMEA and extremely simple FMEA used by Airbus in the initial development phases. We discuss the use of ontologies to support efficient FMEA and HazId. The chapter starts with a discussion of FMEA and especially on the use of generic failure modes. In addition we also give a short introduction to HazId. After the introduction to FMEA we discuss the relationship between a control systems FMEA and the systems environment how does a failure propagate to the environment to create harm. Here we also discuss the important concepts of generic fault trees and hazard lists, both heavily used in industry which can be used to study how control systems failures propagate to the control systems environment. We then proceed by giving a short introduction to ontologies and how to create them. We show two examples ontologies for a general control loop and for a simplified steam boiler. The chapter ends with a short discussion on what should be done by computers, using ontologies and computer programs, and what should be left to humans.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stålhane, T. (2015). FMEA, HAZID, and ontologies. In Ontology Modeling in Physical Asset Integrity Management (pp. 45–85). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15326-1_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free