Red and processed meat consumption and mortality: Dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies

320Citations
Citations of this article
432Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective To examine and quantify the potential dose-response relationship between red and processed meat consumption and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality. Design We searched MEDLINE, Embase, ISI Web of Knowledge, CINHAL, Scopus, the Cochrane library and reference lists of retrieved articles up to 30 November 2014 without language restrictions. We retrieved prospective cohort studies that reported risk estimates for all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality by red and/or processed meat intake levels. The dose-response relationships were estimated using data from red and processed meat intake categories in each study. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled relative risks and 95 % confidence intervals and to incorporate between-study variations. Results Nine articles with seventeen prospective cohorts were eligible in this meta-analysis, including a total of 150 328 deaths. There was evidence of a non-linear association between processed meat consumption and risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, but not for cancer mortality. For processed meat, the pooled relative risk with an increase of one serving per day was 1·15 (95 % CI 1·11, 1·19) for all-cause mortality (five studies; P<0·001 for linear trend), 1·15 (95 % CI 1·07, 1·24) for cardiovascular mortality (six studies; P<0·001) and 1·08 (95 % CI 1·06, 1·11) for cancer mortality (five studies; P<0·001). Similar associations were found with total meat intake. The association between unprocessed red meat consumption and mortality risk was found in the US populations, but not in European or Asian populations. Conclusions The present meta-analysis indicates that higher consumption of total red meat and processed meat is associated with an increased risk of total, cardiovascular and cancer mortality.

References Powered by Scopus

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

49208Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

43084Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting

17864Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

2021 Dietary Guidance to Improve Cardiovascular Health: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association

599Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Food groups and risk of all-cause mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies

477Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Potential health hazards of eating red meat

394Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, X., Lin, X., Ouyang, Y. Y., Liu, J., Zhao, G., Pan, A., & Hu, F. B. (2016, April 1). Red and processed meat consumption and mortality: Dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Public Health Nutrition. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980015002062

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 146

68%

Researcher 37

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 21

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 11

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 71

37%

Nursing and Health Professions 60

31%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38

20%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 22

12%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 2
News Mentions: 5
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 253

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free