An Improved Equilibrium Optimizer for Solving Optimal Power Flow Problem

11Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

With the rapid development of the economy, the quality of power systems has assumed an increasingly prominent influence on people’s daily lives. In this paper, an improved equilibrium optimizer (IEO) is proposed to solve the optimal power flow (OPF) problem. The algorithm uses the chaotic equilibrium pool to enhance the information interaction between individuals. In addition, a nonlinear dynamic generation mechanism is introduced to balance the global search and local development capabilities. At the same time, the improved algorithm uses the golden sine strategy to update the individual position and enhance the ability of the algorithm to jump out of local optimums. Sixteen benchmark test functions, Wilcoxon rank sum test and 30 CEC2014 complex test function optimization results show that the improved algorithm has better global searching ability than the basic equilibrium optimizer, as well as faster convergence and a more accurate solution than other improved equilibrium optimizers and metaheuristic algorithms. Finally, the improved algorithm is applied to the standard IEEE 30-bus test systems for different objectives. The obtained results demonstrate that the improved algorithm has better solutions than other algorithms in the literature for solving the optimal power flow problem.

References Powered by Scopus

Grey Wolf Optimizer

15372Citations
4432Readers
Get full text
11092Citations
3133Readers
Get full text
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lan, Z., He, Q., Jiao, H., & Yang, L. (2022). An Improved Equilibrium Optimizer for Solving Optimal Power Flow Problem. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14094992

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘2500.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

67%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 3

100%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0