Determinants of the political use of facebook in ecuador: Attitudes, recruitment and emotions

4Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation is to contribute to the understanding of the determinants of political participation on Facebook. Based on the civic voluntarism model, it was possible to verify, through multiple regressions, that political attitudes, emotions and recruitment efforts influence the political use of Facebook. On the contrary, the availability of resources does not constitute a significant predictor. Additionally, the mobilizing effect of emotions changes according to individual levels of political efficacy.

References Powered by Scopus

Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis

4359Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Moderation in Management Research: What, Why, When, and How

2296Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks

2268Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Communication strategies in the climate change debate on Facebook. Discourse on the Madrid Climate Summit (COP 25)

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Communicating Climate Change on TikTok During the Climate Summits: From the Environmental Issues to the Politicization of Discourse

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The mediating role of emotions in offline and online political participation: A post-social outbreak study in Ecuador and Chile

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zumárraga-Espinosa, M., Silva-Valdivieso, L., & Trujillo-Sánchez, A. (2020). Determinants of the political use of facebook in ecuador: Attitudes, recruitment and emotions. America Latina Hoy, 86, 79–102. https://doi.org/10.14201/alh.18564

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

60%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

20%

Researcher 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 5

56%

Arts and Humanities 2

22%

Philosophy 1

11%

Psychology 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free