Abstract
Accumulating studies suggested that microRNAs (miRNAs) can have high diagnostic value as a non-invasive and cost-effective procedure with high sensitivity and specificity in the detection of early-stage lung cancer. However, there is inconsistency observed in the results of relevant studies. Therefore, we performed this meta-analysis to evaluate diagnostic value of miRNAs based on all related studies. A total of 38 studies from 13 included articles were used for the analysis, consisting of 510 patients and 465 healthy controls. All analyses were performed on the R 3.2.0 software. The bivariate random-effects meta-analysis model was applied to obtain the following pooled parameters: sensitivity, 0.797 (95% CI: 0.756-0.832); false positive rate, 0.296 (95% CI: 0.250-0.346); and AUC, 0.818. In addition, subgroup analyses were conducted, showing not only that a combination of multiple miRNAs as biomarkers have greater diagnostic value for early-stage lung cancer (sensitivity, false positive rate and AUC of 83%, 25.2% and 0.858, respectively) had a higher diagnostic accuracy than single miRNA (sensitivity, false positive rate and AUC of 78.3%, 31.6% and 0.799, respectively), but also that specimen from circulating system (sensitivity, false positive rate and AUC of 82.5%, 30.5% and 0.836, respectively) provide better biomarkers than specimen from non-circulating system (sensitivity, false positive rate and AUC of 73.8%, 26.5% and 0.796, respectively). In summary, the current meta-analysis suggests that miRNAs as biomarkers, particularly a combination of multiple tumor-specific miRNAs from circulating system, have moderately high clinical diagnostic value in the detection of early-stage lung cancer. However, the clinical diagnostic utilization and additional improvements of miRNAs as biomarkers for early-stage lung cancer detection still remain to be further validated by more future studies.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
He, W. J., Li, W. H., Jiang, B., Wang, Y. F., Xia, Y. X., & Wang, L. (2015). MicroRNAs level as an initial screening method for early-stage lung cancer: A bivariate diagnostic random-effects meta-analysis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 8(8), 12317–12326.
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.