Ceramic bone graft substitute with equine bone protein extract is comparable to allograft in terms of implant fixation: A study in dogs

15Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background and purpose: We studied whether osseointegration and fixation of plasma-sprayed titanium implants grafted with β-TCP granules (Ossaplast) can be improved by adding an osteogenic signal (Colloss E). The results were compared to implants grafted with fresh frozen morselized allograft with and without the Colloss E device. Methods: 4 porous-coated Ti implants were placed in the proximal humeri in each of 10 dogs. All implants were surrounded by a 2.5-mm defect, which was grafted with: (A) β-TCP, (B) β-TCP+20 mg Colloss E, (C) allograft, or (D) allograft+20 mg Colloss E. The observation time was 4 weeks. Results: Mechanical testing showed that the β-TCP group with Colloss E was twice as well fixed as the control group grafted with β-TCP granules alone, and comparable to both allograft groups. We found that every control implant in the β-TCP grafted group was covered by a dense fibrous membrane. No fibrous tissue was seen in the β-TCP group augmented with Colloss. These implants were well osseointegrated, with new bone covering 10-25% of the implant surface. Both treated groups had increased graft resorption compared to their respective control groups. Colloss E had no effect on new bone formation or fibrous tissue reduction around the allografted implants. Interpretation: The Colloss E device improved early osseointegration of implants grafted with β-TCP granules and increased their mechanical implant fixation to the level of allografted implants. The experiment indicates that ceramic bone substitutes may be a viable alternative to allograft when combined with an osteogenic signal such as Colloss E. Copyright © Taylor & Francis 2008. all rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baas, J., Elmengaard, B., Bechtold, J., Chen, X., & Søballe, K. (2008). Ceramic bone graft substitute with equine bone protein extract is comparable to allograft in terms of implant fixation: A study in dogs. Acta Orthopaedica, 79(6), 841–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670810016948

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free