Biographies or blenders: Which resource is best for cross-domain sentiment analysis?

17Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Domain adaptation is usually discussed from the point of view of new algorithms that minimise performance loss when applying a classifier trained on one domain to another. However, finding pertinent data similar to the test domain is equally important for achieving high accuracy in a cross-domain task. This study proposes an algorithm for automatic estimation of performance loss in the context of cross-domain sentiment classification. We present and validate several measures of domain similarity specially designed for the sentiment classification task. We also introduce a new characteristic, called domain complexity, as another independent factor influencing performance loss, and propose various functions for its approximation. Finally, a linear regression for modeling accuracy loss is built and tested in different evaluation settings. As a result, we are able to predict the accuracy loss with an average error of 1.5% and a maximum error of 3.4%. © 2012 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ponomareva, N., & Thelwall, M. (2012). Biographies or blenders: Which resource is best for cross-domain sentiment analysis? In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 7181 LNCS, pp. 488–499). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28604-9_40

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free