Doubly robust pseudo-likelihood for incomplete hierarchical binary data

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Missing data is almost inevitable in correlated-data studies. For non-Gaussian outcomes with moderate to large sequences, direct-likelihood methods can involve complex, hard-to-manipulate likelihoods. Popular alternative approaches, like generalized estimating equations, that are frequently used to circumvent the computational complexity of full likelihood, are less suitable when scientific interest, at least in part, is placed on the association structure; pseudo-likelihood (PL) methods are then a viable alternative. When the missing data are missing at random, Molenberghs et al. (2011, Statistica Sinica, 21,187–206) proposed a suite of corrections to the standard form of PL, taking the form of singly and doubly robust estimators. They provided the basis and exemplified it in insightful yet primarily illustrative examples. We here consider the important case of marginal models for hierarchical binary data, provide an effective implementation and illustrate it using data from an analgesic trial. Our doubly robust estimator is more convenient than the classical doubly robust estimators. The ideas are illustrated using a marginal model for a binary response, more specifically a Bahadur model.

References Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

Statistical analysis with missing data

13950Citations
4793Readers

Your institution provides access to this article.

7118Citations
2794Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hermans, L., Ivanova, A., Sotto, C., Molenberghs, G., Verbeke, G., & Kenward, M. G. (2020). Doubly robust pseudo-likelihood for incomplete hierarchical binary data. Statistical Modelling, 20(1), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471082X18808611

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘21036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

67%

Researcher 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Mathematics 2

50%

Decision Sciences 1

25%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0