Merging radar and in situ rainfall measurements: An assessment of different combination algorithms

27Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Merging radar and gauge rainfall estimates is an area of active research. Since rain gauges alone are often limited at representing the complete spatial distribution of rainfall, a combination of radar-derived rainfall with spatially interpolated gauge estimates using alternate weighting approaches is investigated. This paper examines several merging methods that differ in the consideration of correlation among the estimation errors, their distribution, and the application of dynamic and static weighting. The merging process has been applied to the radar data from Terrey Hills radar located in Sydney, Australia, and spatially interpolated gauge rainfall on the same area. The performance of the merging methods is assessed by comparing the combined estimate with the gauge observation. It is however clear from our findings that rainfall estimation from any of the combination approaches assessed contains less error than any of the noncombination approaches. The results show that the correlation between these two rainfall estimation errors plays a significant role in the performance of the merging methods. The combination method should be chosen depending on the purpose, accuracy of the estimate, and complexity of the method.

References Powered by Scopus

1605Citations
733Readers
Get full text
1518Citations
558Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hasan, M. M., Sharma, A., Johnson, F., Mariethoz, G., & Seed, A. (2016). Merging radar and in situ rainfall measurements: An assessment of different combination algorithms. Water Resources Research, 52(10), 8384–8398. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018441

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

68%

Researcher 7

32%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 11

48%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 7

30%

Environmental Science 4

17%

Computer Science 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0