Invasive evaluation of the microvasculature in acute myocardial infarction: Coronary flow reserve versus the index of microcirculatory resistance

17Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one of the most common causes of death in both the developed and developing world. It has high associated morbidity despite prompt institution of recommended therapy. The focus over the last few decades in ST-segment elevation AMI has been on timely reperfusion of the epicardial vessel. However, microvascular consequences after reperfusion, such as microvascular obstruction (MVO), are equally reliable predictors of outcome. The attention on the microcirculation has meant that traditional angiographic/anatomic methods are insufficient. We searched PubMed and the Cochrane database for English-language studies published between January 2000 and November 2019 that investigated the use of invasive physiologic tools in AMI. Based on these results, we provide a comprehensive review regarding the role for the invasive evaluation of the microcirculation in AMI, with specific emphasis on coronary flow reserve (CFR) and the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Clarke, J. R. D., Kennedy, R., Lau, F. D., Lancaster, G. I., & Zarich, S. W. (2020, January 1). Invasive evaluation of the microvasculature in acute myocardial infarction: Coronary flow reserve versus the index of microcirculatory resistance. Journal of Clinical Medicine. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010086

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free