Retrospective Analyses Are Hard: AÂ Cautionary Tale from EPA's Air Toxics Regulations

7Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Under the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was required to establish standards limiting air toxics emissions from industrial plants. This paper examines the effects of five of the largest-cost rules issued by EPA in the initial round of air toxics rulemaking over the 1995 to 2000 period. Our estimates suggest that plants in the printing and publishing and pulp and paper industries realized important reductions in their air toxics emissions in the period between publication of the final rule and the effective date for compliance with the rule-although the reduction in air toxics emissions by pulp and paper mills fell short of EPA's ex ante projections. However, our estimates also suggest that plants in three other industries-petroleum refining, pharmaceuticals, and wood furniture-achieved little or no additional reduction in air toxics emissions over the compliance period in response to EPA's rules. Finally, the paper explores steps that EPA should take in setting up future retrospective analyses.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fraas, A., & Egorenkov, A. (2018). Retrospective Analyses Are Hard: AÂ Cautionary Tale from EPA’s Air Toxics Regulations. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 9(2), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1017/bca.2017.8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free