Semantic research of military icons based on behavioral experiments and eye-tracking experiments

4Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

As a type of symbol, there are four dimensions in icons’ symbolic interpretation, namely semantic, syntactic, contextual and pragmatic dimension. Among those dimensions, semantic dimension is the most important one in user’s cognitive analysis. Based on the representation of semantics, icons can be classified into four types, namely function-metaphor, operation-metaphor, objectmetaphor and meaning-metaphor icon. Here we conducted behavioral experiment and eye-tracking experiment to evaluate those four types of icons selected from military aeronautical system. The behavioral experiment showed that subjects have lowest reaction time to function-metaphor icons and highest accuracy to identify object-metaphor icons. The eye-tracking system showed that subjects have the most fixations when searching for object-metaphor icons and the least fixations when searching for function-metaphor icons. Our research is the first endeavor into the investigation of human’s response to different types of icons in the military systems and thus provided novel and valuable guidance to the design of icons in those systems.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, X. J., Xue, C., Niu, Y., Wang, H., Zhang, J., & Shao, J. (2015). Semantic research of military icons based on behavioral experiments and eye-tracking experiments. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9186, pp. 24–31). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20886-2_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free