A Lower Bound on the Size of Decomposable Negation Normal Form

18Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We consider in this paper the size of a Decomposable Negation Normal Form (DNNF) that respects a given vtree (known as structured DNNF). This representation of propositional knowledge bases was introduced recently and shown to include OBDD as a special case (an OBDD variable ordering is a special type of vtree). We provide a lower bound on the size of any structured DNNF and discuss three particular instances of this bound, which correspond to three distinct subsets of structured DNNF (including OBDD). We show that our lower bound subsumes the influential Sieling and Wegener's lower bound for OBDDs, which is typically used for identifying variable orderings that will cause a blowup in the OBDD size. We show that our lower bound allows for similar usage but with respect to vtrees, which provide structure for DNNFs in the same way that variable orderings provide structure for OBDDs. We finally discuss some of the theoretical and practical implications of our lower bound.

References Powered by Scopus

Graph-Based Algorithms for Boolean Function Manipulation

6066Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A knowledge compilation map

760Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Decomposable negation normal form

301Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

SDD: A new canonical representation of propositional knowledge bases

265Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On compiling CNF into decision-DNNF

30Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Circuit treewidth, sentential decision, and query compilation

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pipatsrisawat, K., & Darwiche, A. (2010). A Lower Bound on the Size of Decomposable Negation Normal Form. In Proceedings of the 24th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2010 (pp. 345–350). AAAI Press. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v24i1.7600

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

70%

Researcher 6

30%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 20

91%

Mathematics 1

5%

Engineering 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free