Evaluation of shear bond strength of different treatments of ceramic bracket surfaces

0Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the bonding strength of the ceramic bracket and composite resin restoration interface, using four types of treatment on the base of the bracket. Methodology: 48 photoactivated composite resin discs were used (Filtek™ Z250) contained in specimens and divided into 4 groups of 12 specimens for each group according to the type of treatment performed on the base of the brackets. Once the brackets were bonded, the specimens were subjected to shear stress carried out in a universal testing machine (MTS: 810 Material Test System) calibrated with a fixed speed of 0.5 mm / minute. The values obtained were recorded and compared by means of appropriate statistical tests - analysis of variance and then Tukey's test. Results and conclusions: The surfaces of ceramic brackets conditioned with 10% hydrofluoric acid for 1 minute, followed by aluminum oxide blasting, 50μ, after silane application and primer application, was considered the best method to prepare surfaces of ceramic brackets prior to orthodontic esthetic bonding. © 2012 Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics.

References Powered by Scopus

The integumental profile

249Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Direct bonding of orthodontic attachments to teeth: the relation of adhesive bond strength to gauze mesh size.

131Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An investigation of the composite resin/porcelain interface

75Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Andrade, P. H. R., Reges, R. V., & Lenza, M. A. (2012). Evaluation of shear bond strength of different treatments of ceramic bracket surfaces. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/s2176-94512012000400005

Readers over time

‘14‘16‘18‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

44%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

44%

Researcher 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 10

83%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

8%

Psychology 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0