Temporal inhibition in character identification

5Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Models of information processing tasks such as character identification often do not consider the nature of the initial sensory representation from which task-relevant information is extracted. An important component of this representation is temporal inhibition, in which the response to a stimulus may inhibit, or in some cases facilitate, processing of subsequent stimuli. Three experiments demonstrate the existence of temporal inhibitory processes in information processing tasks such as character identification and digit recall. An existing information processing model is extended to account for these effects, based in part on models from the detection literature. These experiments also discriminate between candidate neural mechanisms of the temporal inhibition. Implications for the transient deficit theory of dyslexia are discussed.

References Powered by Scopus

The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies

8818Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method

2001Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results

760Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Aspects of hologram calculation for video frames

88Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Liquid crystal over silicon device characteristics for holographic projection of high-definition television images

51Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Recognition of letters displayed as briefly flashed dot patterns

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Busey, T. A. (1998). Temporal inhibition in character identification. Perception and Psychophysics, 60(8), 1285–1304. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207992

Readers over time

‘10‘14‘17‘18‘20‘2100.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

63%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

25%

Researcher 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 4

50%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

25%

Physics and Astronomy 1

13%

Engineering 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0