Update in the methodology of the chronic stress paradigm: Internal control matters

122Citations
Citations of this article
249Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

To date, the reliability of induction of a depressive-like state using chronic stress models is confronted by many methodological limitations. We believe that the modifications to the stress paradigm in mice proposed herein allow some of these limitations to be overcome. Here, we discuss a variant of the standard stress paradigm, which results in anhedonia. This anhedonic state was defined by a decrease in sucrose preference that was not exhibited by all animals. As such, we propose the use of non-anhedonic, stressed mice as an internal control in experimental mouse models of depression. The application of an internal control for the effects of stress, along with optimized behavioural testing, can enable the analysis of biological correlates of stress-induced anhedonia versus the consequences of stress alone in a chronic-stress depression model. This is illustrated, for instance, by distinct physiological and molecular profiles in anhedonic and non-anhedonic groups subjected to stress. These results argue for the use of a subgroup of individuals who are negative for the induction of a depressive phenotype during experimental paradigms of depression as an internal control, for more refined modeling of this disorder in animals. © 2011 Strekalova et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Strekalova, T., Couch, Y., Kholod, N., Boyks, M., Malin, D., Leprince, P., & Steinbusch, H. M. W. (2011, April 27). Update in the methodology of the chronic stress paradigm: Internal control matters. Behavioral and Brain Functions. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-7-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free