Strategic Maneuvering with the Burden of Proof

3Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

According to Johnson (Argumentation & Rhetoric (CD-ROM). OSSA, St. Catherines, Ontario, 1998), to engage in the practice of argumentation is “to enter argumentative space.” The problem with this endeavor is that different theoreticians see this space in different ways. We, from our point of view, distinguish between two general meta-perspectives in the study of argumentation: a dialectical perspective focusing on critical debate, and a rhetorical perspective concentrating on the most appropriate means of persuasion in a certain context. This distinction, of course, corresponds with the well-known Aristotelian division.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2015). Strategic Maneuvering with the Burden of Proof. In Argumentation Library (Vol. 27, pp. 425–442). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_21

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free