OBJECTIVE Neonatal diabetes mellitus is a rare form of diabetes diagnosed in infancy. Nearly half of patients with permanent neonatal diabetes have mutations in the genes for the ATP-sensitive potassium channel ( KCNJ11 and ABCC8 ) that allow switching from insulin to sulfonylurea therapy. Although treatment conversion has dramatic benefits, the cost-effectiveness of routine genetic testing is unknown. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We conducted a societal cost-utility analysis comparing a policy of routine genetic testing to no testing among children with permanent neonatal diabetes. We used a simulation model of type 1 diabetic complications, with the outcome of interest being the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER, $/quality-adjusted life-year [QALY] gained) over 30 years of follow-up. RESULTS In the base case, the testing policy dominated the no-testing policy. The testing policy was projected to bring about quality-of-life benefits that enlarged over time (0.32 QALYs at 10 years, 0.70 at 30 years) and produced savings in total costs that were present as early as 10 years ($12,528 at 10 years, $30,437 at 30 years). Sensitivity analyses indicated that the testing policy would remain cost-saving as long as the prevalence of the genetic defects remained >3% and would retain an ICER
CITATION STYLE
Greeley, S. A. W., John, P. M., Winn, A. N., Ornelas, J., Lipton, R. B., Philipson, L. H., … Huang, E. S. (2011). The Cost-Effectiveness of Personalized Genetic Medicine. Diabetes Care, 34(3), 622–627. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc10-1616
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.