Operation enduring freedom: Trends in combat casualty care by forward surgical teams deployed to Afghanistan

41Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study examined the clinical experience of a U.S. Army Forward Surgical Team (FST) deployed to Afghanistan in 2005 and compared the findings with those of 3 previously deployed FSTs. Medical records of all patients evaluated by the FST were abstracted for analysis. Demographically, the cohort ( n = 614) was predominantly male (94%), with a median age of 24, and distributed according to the following: disease (8.6%), nonbattle injury (42%), and battle injury (49%). Combat casualties were mostly Afghan National Army or Police (56%) and U.S. military (21%). Predominant wounding instruments were small arms (34%), improvised explosive devices (33%), and rocket-propelled grenades (15%). Anatomical sites of battle injury were extremities (38%), external soft tissue (35%), and head/neck/torso (28%). Operative procedures for combat injury ( n = 227) were primarily orthopedic (45%) or thoracic/abdominal (36%). Combat casualty statistics provide insight to trauma epidemiology, patterns, and trends vital for surgical management. Workload statistics guides the structuring, training, and employment of FSTs. Copyright © Association of Military Surgeons of the US. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shen-Gunther, J., Ellison, R., Kuhens, C., Roach, C. J., & Jarrard, S. (2011). Operation enduring freedom: Trends in combat casualty care by forward surgical teams deployed to Afghanistan. Military Medicine, 176(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-10-00109

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free