Passive euthanasia occurs where the use of ``extraordinary'' life-sustaining measures are discontinued or refrained from. No more ``heroic'' efforts are made in an attempt to prolong life in hopeless cases where such prolongation seems an unwarranted extension of either suffering or unconsciousness. Generally speaking, the medical fraternity is more prone to withhold treatment than withdrawing it per se. Many countries around the globe have addressed the issue of passive euthanasia to decriminalize it. However, the two factions of for and against are convicted in their arguments. This entry will briefly address arguments in favor, namely, autonomy and the regulation of euthanasia and those against which are sanctity of life, slippery slope, danger of abuse, and the financial burden argument. Discussing passive euthanasia, one cannot negate the importance of culture.
CITATION STYLE
Nortjé, N. (2016). Euthanasia: Passive. In Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics (pp. 1203–1209). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_182
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.