Theoretical framework to surpass the Betz limit using unsteady fluid mechanics

13Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Betz limit expresses the maximum proportion of the kinetic energy flux incident on an energy conversion device that can be extracted from an unbounded flow. The derivation of the Betz limit requires an assumption of steady flow through a notional actuator disk that is stationary in the streamwise direction. The present derivation relaxes the assumptions of steady flow and streamwise actuator disk stationarity, which expands the physically realizable parameter space of flow conditions upstream and downstream of the actuator disk. A key consequence of this generalization is the existence of unsteady motions that can, in principle, lead to energy conversion efficiencies that exceed the Betz limit not only transiently but also in time-averaged performance. Potential physical implementations of those unsteady motions are speculated.

References Powered by Scopus

Wind turbines: Fundamentals, technologies, application, economics

881Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Low-order modeling of wind farm aerodynamics using leaky Rankine bodies

37Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A reference Pelton turbine design

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Wake-foil interactions and energy harvesting efficiency in tandem oscillating foils

29Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Analysis of unsteady flow effects on the Betz limit for flapping foil power generation

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Hybrid pitch angle controller approaches for stable wind turbine power under variablewind speed

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dabiri, J. O. (2020). Theoretical framework to surpass the Betz limit using unsteady fluid mechanics. Physical Review Fluids, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.5.022501

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

65%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

24%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

6%

Researcher 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 11

73%

Energy 2

13%

Social Sciences 1

7%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free