What is the impact of psychiatric decision units on mental health crisis care pathways? Protocol for an interrupted time series analysis with a synthetic control study

4Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The UK mental health system is stretched to breaking point. Individuals presenting with mental health problems wait longer at the ED than those presenting with physical concerns and finding a bed when needed is difficult - 91% of psychiatric wards are operating at above the recommended occupancy rate. To address the pressure, a new type of facility - psychiatric decision units (also known as mental health decision units) - have been introduced in some areas. These are short-stay facilities, available upon referral, targeted to help individuals who may be able to avoid an inpatient admission or lengthy ED visit. To advance knowledge about the effectiveness of this service for this purpose, we will examine the effect of the service on the mental health crisis care pathway over a 4-year time period; the 2 years proceeding and following the introduction of the service. We use aggregate service level data of key indicators of the performance of this pathway. Methods: Data from four mental health Trusts in England will be analysed using an interrupted time series (ITS) design with the primary outcomes of the rate of (i) ED psychiatric presentations and (ii) voluntary admissions to mental health wards. This will be supplemented with a synthetic control study with the same primary outcomes, in which a comparable control group is generated for each outcome using a donor pool of suitable National Health Service Trusts in England. The methods are well suited to an evaluation of an intervention at a service delivery level targeting population-level health outcome and the randomisation or 'trialability' of the intervention is limited. The synthetic control study controls for national trends over time, increasing our confidence in the results. The study has been designed and will be carried out with the involvement of service users and carers. Discussion: This will be the first formal evaluation of psychiatric decision units in England. The analysis will provide estimates of the effect of the decision units on a number of important service use indicators, providing much-needed information for those designing service pathways. Trial registration: primary registry: isrctn.com Identifying number: ISRCTN77588384 Link: Date of registration in primary registry: 27/02/2020. Primary sponsor: St George's, University of London, Cramner Road, Tooting, SW17 ORE. Primary contact: Joe Montebello.

References Powered by Scopus

Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations

4969Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series studies in medication use research

2474Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Interrupted time series designs in health technology assessment: Lessons from two systematic reviews of behavior change strategies

523Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The psychiatric decision unit as an emerging model in mental health crisis care: a national survey in England

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Impact of changes in community psychiatric service provision on mental health presentations to the emergency department

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The effect of psychiatric decision unit services on inpatient admissions and mental health presentations in emergency departments: An interrupted time series analysis from two cities and one rural area in England

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Goldsmith, L. P., Smith, J. G., Clarke, G., Anderson, K., Lomani, J., Turner, K., & Gillard, S. (2020). What is the impact of psychiatric decision units on mental health crisis care pathways? Protocol for an interrupted time series analysis with a synthetic control study. BMC Psychiatry, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02581-5

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

60%

Researcher 7

35%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 7

37%

Psychology 6

32%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

21%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free