Bribery and International Commercial Arbitration – the Role of Mandatory Rules and Public Policy

  • Pavić V
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Although designed to resolve private disputes, usually commercial in nature, arbitration may nevertheless encounter during its course allegations of impropriety and criminal behaviour. In the context of international commercial arbitration, the most common of those are allegations of bribery. However, tribunals may adjudicate only matters of private law and, should they establish existence of bribery, may draw only civil law consequences thereof. An additional problem in this respect is determining the body of rules that will be applicable in defining the very notion of bribery, since some aspects of bribery are almost universally prohibited, while the others are banned only in certain jurisdictions. In determining the law applicable to the matters of bribery, tribunals then face choice-of-law dilemmas. Each of the public policy techniques (overriding mandatory provisions, international and/or transnational) has its strengths and weaknesses.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pavić, V. (2012). Bribery and International Commercial Arbitration – the Role of Mandatory Rules and Public Policy. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 43(4), 661–686. https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v43i4.5016

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free