Ballot secrecy and ballot independence coincide

17Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We study ballot independence for election schemes: - We formally define ballot independence as a cryptographic game and prove that ballot secrecy implies ballot independence. - We introduce a notion of controlled malleability and show that it is sufficient for ballot independence. We also show that non-malleable ballots are sufficient, but not necessary, for ballot independence. - We prove that ballot independence is sufficient for ballot secrecy under practical assumptions. Our results show that ballot independence is necessary in election schemes satisfying ballot secrecy. Furthermore, our sufficient conditions enable simpler proofs of ballot secrecy. © 2013 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smyth, B., & Bernhard, D. (2013). Ballot secrecy and ballot independence coincide. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 8134 LNCS, pp. 463–480). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40203-6_26

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free