Hydrodynamic properties of hydrocephalus shunts: United kingdom shunt evaluation laboratory

61Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background - Although about 80% of properly diagnosed patients with hydrocephalus improve after implantation of any model of shunt, the remaining 20% may develop further complications because of inadequate shunt performance. Therefore, hydrocephalus shunts require careful independent laboratory evaluation. Method - Computer supported shunt testing, based on the new International Standard Organisation directives, characterises various aspects of pressure-flow performance of shunts such as variability with time, susceptibility to reflux, siphoning, temperature related behaviour, external pressure, the influence of a strong magnetic field (for example, MRI), presence of pulsation in differential pressure, particles in drained fluid, etc. Results - Seven different models of valves, representing most common constructions, have been tested so far. Most contemporary valves have a hydrodynamic resistance which is too low. This may result in overdrainage both related to posture and during nocturnal cerebral vasogenic waves. A long distal catheter increases the resistance of these valves by 100%-200%. Most shunts are very sensitive to the presence of air bubbles and small particles in drained fluid. Few shunt models offer reasonable resistance to negative outlet pressure, preventing complications related to overdrainage. Valves with an antisiphon device may be blocked by raised subcutaneous pressure. All programmable valves are susceptible to overdrainage in an upright position. Conclusion - The behaviour of a valve during such testing is of immediate relevance to the surgeon and may not be adequately described in the manufacturer's product information.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Czosnyka, M., Czosnyka, Z., Whitehouse, H., & Pickard, J. D. (1997). Hydrodynamic properties of hydrocephalus shunts: United kingdom shunt evaluation laboratory. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 62(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.62.1.43

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free