Development, implementation, and evaluation of a prostate cancer supportive care program

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Many men who are diagnosed with prostate cancer face long-term treatment-related health effects that will affect their quality of life and have cost implications for the health system. In this article, we describe and assess the use of and satisfaction with the Prostate Cancer Supportive Care (PCSC) Program, which is a comprehensive, evidence-based, modular program that aims to address these concerns. We include data from patient medical records, PCSC Program registration forms and attendance records, and anonymized participant feedback forms. We examine the clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of program participants, program participation rates, and satisfaction with individual program modules. Among the 1,269 registrants, 1,206 (84%) participated in the program. Modules that provided information on prostate cancer and treatment options and offered sexual health support had the most participants (29% and 55% of total program participants, respectively). Satisfaction with all program components was high among both survivors and their partners (average score, 3.6 out of 4). Robust evaluations of the program’s effects on quality of life and health system costs are ongoing. There is a growing need to provide consistent and comprehensive support to prostate cancer survivors and their partners and families. As such, we recommend that alongside direct oncologic care, clinicians assess their patients’ needs for supportive care services and refer them to programs that will provide comprehensive support throughout the disease and treatment journey.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hedden, L., Pollock, P., Elliot, S., Bossio, J. A., Weller, S., Van Patten, C. L., … Higano, C. S. (2018). Development, implementation, and evaluation of a prostate cancer supportive care program. Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology, 16(6), E234–E242. https://doi.org/10.12788/jcso.0438

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free