Implementation of e-court in settlement of civil cases in Singaraja district court

Abstract

This study aims to find out the application of e-court in the settlement of civil cases in The District Court of Singaraja Class IB and the juridical implications of one of the features of e-court, e-summon against valid and appropriate summons. The problems that arise are related to the maximum or implementation of some features of e-court, namely e-summon and e-litigation and e-summon features that deviate from the provisions in Herziene Indonesische Reglement (HIR) and Rechtsreglement voor De Buitengewesten (RBG). Qualitative research of an empirical juridical nature conducted in the Singaraja District Court Class IB shows that the application of e-court, in general, can contribute to the efficiency and effectiveness of the judiciary. This condition is seen in all registration of cases through lawyers in the Court has been done through e-filing, as well as estimates of fees and payment of case fees that have used e-SKUM and e-payment. E-summon and e-litigation users have not been maximal or implemented because judicial users are still reluctant to use the feature. The results of the study also showed that one of the features of e-court e-summon deviated from the provisions in Herziene Indonesische Reglement (HIR) and Rechtsreglement Voor De Buitengewesten (RBG) related to the summoning of the parties, but this condition can be understood given the process of establishing a new civil event law requires a long process while increasing efficiency and effectiveness is immediately needed by the judiciary.