Implementation of a decision aid for localized prostate cancer in routine care: A successful implementation strategy

10Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

For the treatment choice of localized prostate cancer, effective patient decision aids have been developed. The implementation of decision aids in routine care, however, lags behind. Main known barriers are lack of confidence in the tool, lack of training on its use, lack of resources and lack of time. A new implementation strategy addresses these barriers. Using this implementation strategy, the implementation rate of a decision aid was measured in eight hospitals and questionnaires were filled out by 24 care providers and 255 patients. The average implementation rate was 60 per cent (range 31%–100%). Hardly any barriers remained for care providers. Patients who did not use the decision aid appeared to be more unwilling than unable to use the decision aid. By addressing known barriers, that is, informing care providers on the effectiveness of the decision aid, providing instructions on its use, embedding it in the existing workflow and making it available free of charge, a successful implementation of a prostate cancer decision aid was reached.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van Tol-Geerdink, J. J., van Oort, I. M., Somford, D. M., Wijburg, C. J., Geboers, A., van Uden-Kraan, C. F., … Stalmeier, P. F. M. (2020). Implementation of a decision aid for localized prostate cancer in routine care: A successful implementation strategy. Health Informatics Journal, 26(2), 1194–1207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458219873528

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free