Explanation of Postprocedural Fractional Flow Reserve Below 0.85

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) after percutaneous coronary intervention is a predictor of adverse cardiovascular events during follow-up. However, the rationale for low post procedural FFR values remains often elusive based on angiographic findings alone. METHODS AND RESULTS: FFR SEARCH (Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital) is a prospective single-center registry in which post-percutaneous coronary intervention FFR was assessed in 1000 consecutive all-comer patients. FFR measurements were performed with a microcatheter 20 mm distal to the most distal stent edge. In 100 vessels with a post procedural FFR 0.85, and 20 vessels >0.85 high definition intravascular ultrasound analysis was performed. In 100 vessels with a post-percutaneous coronary intervention FFR 0.85, mean post procedural FFR was 0.790.05. Minimal lumen area was 2.19 (1.81-3.19) mm2, mean lumen area was 5.95 (5.01-7.03) mm2, and minimal stent area was 4.01 (3.09-5.21) mm2. Significant residual focal proximal lesions were found in 29% of the assessed vessels whereas, focal distal lesions were found in 30% of the vessels. Stent underexpansion and malapposition were found in 74% and 22% of vessels, respectively. Clear focal signs of luminal narrowing were found in 54% of the vessels analyzed. Although incidences of focal lesions, underexpansion, and malapposition were similar between both cohorts, minimal stent area was significantly smaller in vessels with a post-percutaneous coronary intervention FFR 0.85 as compared with those with an FFR >0.85. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a post procedural FFR 0.85, intravascular ultrasound revealed focal signs of luminal narrowing in a significant number of cases.