Iran's nuclear program: The case for engagement

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

For 10 years the international community has failed to achieve a diplomatic resolution to the crisis surrounding Iran's nuclear program. As Iran's potential to make nuclear weapons matures, some observers may feel that diplomacy has become futile. This chapter argues reviews the history of diplomatic efforts and current national positions and concludes that there is no fundamental reason why a diplomatic solution is impossible. Instead, past attempts have been plagued by poor messaging, bad timing, and organizational problems associated with domestic and international institutions. Instead of leading to despair, this history can inform future diplomatic strategy, and suggests a promising path forward. Nevertheless, given the enormous difficulty of diplomacy, one could reasonably ask if there were better alternatives. This chapter reviews a range of possible paths and concludes that, despite the challenges, diplomacy remains the best way to end the crisis on peaceful terms.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kemp, R. S. (2013). Iran’s nuclear program: The case for engagement. In Assessment of the Nuclear Programs of Iran and North Korea (Vol. 9789400760196, pp. 77–90). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6019-6_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free