The Effects of Body Location and Biosignal Feedback Modality on Performance and Workload Using Electromyography in Virtual Reality

4Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Using biosignals through electromyography (EMG) and rendering them as feedback for hands-free interaction finally migrates to engaging virtual reality (VR) experiences for health and fitness-related applications. Previous work proposes various body locations as input sources and different output modalities for creating effective biofeedback loops. However, it is currently unknown which muscles and sensory modalities can provide optimal real-time interaction regarding the performance and perceived workload of the users. In two VR studies (N=18 and N=40) based on a Fitts' law target selection task, we explored sensor placement at different body locations and investigate auditory, tactile, and visual feedback modalities. Objective and subjective results indicate that input performance can be improved by presenting muscle tension as simultaneous tactile and visual feedback. We contribute with recommendations for registration of isometric muscle contraction at different body locations and conclude that reproducing physiological feedback through multimodal channels can assist users interacting with EMG devices.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sehrt, J., Wißmann, T., Breitenbach, J., & Schwind, V. (2023). The Effects of Body Location and Biosignal Feedback Modality on Performance and Workload Using Electromyography in Virtual Reality. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580738

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free