Intramuscular progesterone (Gestone) versus vaginal progesterone suppository (Cyclogest) for luteal phase support in cycles of in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer: patient preference and drug efficacy

  • Zaman A
  • Coskun S
  • Alsanie A
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The requirement for luteal phase support (LPS) in stimulated IVF cycles is well established, however drug choice, and route of administration and duration of use are not. This report evaluates patients’ preference and satisfaction by using either vaginal or intramuscular (IM) progesterone (P) supplementation for luteal phase support after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET).

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zaman, A. Y., Coskun, S., Alsanie, A. A., & Awartani, K. A. (2017). Intramuscular progesterone (Gestone) versus vaginal progesterone suppository (Cyclogest) for luteal phase support in cycles of in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer: patient preference and drug efficacy. Fertility Research and Practice, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40738-017-0044-y

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2401234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

75%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 6

60%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

20%

Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medic... 1

10%

Psychology 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0