Febrile neutropenia in children with cancer

17Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There is a need for increased consensus in the definition of fever and neutropenia, the approach to risk stratification (including outpatient therapy and early discharge) and choices of empiric antimicrobial therapy in children. - There has been an increased incidence of Gram positive infection in FN patients, in particular with VGS in patient with AML. However, Gram negative bacteria are still responsible for most of the mortality associated with FN. - Piperacillin/tazobactam, cefipime, or meropenem are all effective first-choice antimicrobial monotherapy in FN. There is no good evidence for adding an aminoglycoside compound to the initial empiric therapy regimen. - Following local microbiological data is of utmost importance in choosing the right empiric antimicrobial regimen for a particular institution. - Outpatient management of a well-defined subset of low-risk patient for bacterial invasive infection with intravenous ceftriaxone or oral ciprofloxacin and daily re-evaluation is possible. - Early CT of the chest (after 5-7 days of FN) in high-risk patients is essential to make a prompt diagnosis of pulmonary aspergillosis and improve outcome. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Paulus, S., & Dobson, S. (2009). Febrile neutropenia in children with cancer. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 634, 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79838-7_16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free