The Political-Economic Gradient and the Organization of Urban Space

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Community has once again become de rigueur in the contemporary moment. Its return to prominence coincides with efforts to transform urban governance through a familiar—yet reinvigorated—celebration of venerable social welfare traditions that have long extolled the virtues of local responsibility. American cities are enduring the transformations of a “postwelfare apotheosis,” driven by (re)cultivated affinities for devolution, welfare state retrenchment, and privatization (Katz, 2001). As historian Michael Katz argues, these trends have culminated in the trifold victory of three great forces in social welfare politics: the war on dependence, the devolution of public authority, and the dominance of market models in public policy. The fallout leads states to increasingly displace misery to already distressed cities; while cities, in turn, are left to displace misery to the streets of poor neighborhoods. In this climate, the rhetoric of community voluntarism is pervasive, locatable in the discourse of entities ranging from nonprofits, to civic associations, to multilevel corporations (Sites, Chaskin, and Parks, 2003).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fairbanks, R. P. (2007). The Political-Economic Gradient and the Organization of Urban Space. In Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research (pp. 102–117). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32933-8_7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free