"foreign" language aptitude predicts individual differences in native grammatical proficiency

5Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Language aptitude is known to be a strong predictor of success in late second-language (L2) learning in instructional settings but is generally assumed to be irrelevant for native language (L1) acquisition. We investigated the relationship between language aptitude and L1 grammatical proficiency in the two studies reported here. Language aptitude was measured by means of a newly-developed test of grammatical sensitivity (Studies 1 and 2) and the Language Analysis subtest of the Pimsleur Language Aptitude Battery (Study 1), whereas grammatical proficiency was assessed by a grammaticality judgment task in Study 1 and a picture selection task in Study 2. The results of the two studies reveal a robust relationship between language aptitude and L1 grammatical proficiency that is remarkably consistent across different measures for both variables and appears to hold across the board for a variety of grammatical structures. These results fit well with the proposal that explicit learning may play an important role not only in adult L2 learning but also in L1 acquisition and raises questions about the validity of arguments for a fundamental difference between L1 and L2 acquisition based on the premise that only the latter is related to aptitude.

References Powered by Scopus

58512Citations
26551Readers
Get full text

Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments

2157Citations
1238Readers

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Llompart, M., & Dabrowska, E. (2023). “foreign” language aptitude predicts individual differences in native grammatical proficiency. Linguistics, 61(5), 1165–1193. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2022-0009

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

29%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

29%

Researcher 2

29%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Linguistics 5

71%

Neuroscience 1

14%

Psychology 1

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0