Impact of aging on high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T in patients suspected of acute myocardial infarction

4Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) is widely used for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The current cut-off value of 0.014 ng/mL was determined based on the 99th percentile of a normal reference population; however, little data exist regarding the appropriate cut-off value in the elderly (≥75 years). Accordingly, we aimed to investigate the accuracy of the current cut-off value in an elderly population. Methods We assessed 355 consecutive patients (mean age =66.7±16.1 years, male =210) whose hs-cTnT levels were measured at Kanazawa University Hospital from January 2014 to July 2015. Twenty-six patients were eventually diagnosed with AMI. Hs-cTnT was measured during a visit to the emergency or outpatient department. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were assessed to determine the appropriate cut-off levels, yielding the maximum sensitivity and specificity while dividing the subjects into two groups according to ages (≥75 or ≤74 years). Results The appropriate overall cut-off value was 0.038, the sensitivity and specificity of which were 85% and 89%, respectively, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.945 overall. The conventional cut-off value (99th percentile: 0.014 ng/mL) provided low specificity, particularly in the elderly or those with renal dysfunction. In contrast, a calculated appropriate cut-off provided higher sensitivity with significantly larger c-statistics in the elderly (0.940 vs. 0.629, p<0.001). Conclusion When measuring hs-cTnT, careful assessments are needed in elderly subjects.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ichise, T., Tada, H., Sakata, K., Kawashiri, M. aki, Yamagishi, M., & Hayashi, K. (2017). Impact of aging on high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T in patients suspected of acute myocardial infarction. Internal Medicine, 56(16), 2097–2102. https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.8510-16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free