Inference on treatment effects from a randomized clinical trial in the presence of premature treatment discontinuation: The SYNERGY trial

16Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The Superior Yield of the New Strategy of Enoxaparin, Revascularization, and GlYcoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (SYNERGY) was a randomized, open-label, multicenter clinical trial comparing 2 anticoagulant drugs on the basis of time-to-event endpoints. In contrast to other studies of these agents, the primary, intent-to-treat analysis did not find evidence of a difference, leading to speculation that premature discontinuation of the study agents by some subjects may have attenuated the apparent treatment effect and thus to interest in inference on the difference in survival distributions were all subjects in the population to follow the assigned regimens, with no discontinuation. Such inference is often attempted via ad hoc analyses that are not based on a formal definition of this treatment effect. We use SYNERGY as a context in which to describe how this effect may be conceptualized and to present a statistical framework in which it may be precisely identified, which leads naturally to inferential methods based on inverse probability weighting. © 2010 The Author.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, M., Tsiatis, A. A., Davidian, M., Pieper, K. S., & Mahaffey, K. W. (2011). Inference on treatment effects from a randomized clinical trial in the presence of premature treatment discontinuation: The SYNERGY trial. Biostatistics, 12(2), 258–269. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxq054

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free