Pembrolizumab (Pembro) therapy vs best supportive care (BSC) in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): KEYNOTE-240

  • Finn R
  • Ryoo B
  • Merle P
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Pembro received accelerated approval for second-line therapy in pts with advanced HCC, based on the phase 2, KEYNOTE-224 trial. KEYNOTE-240 was arandomized, phase 3 study of Pembro vs BSC in pts with previously treated advanced HCC. Method: Eligible pts had radiographic or pathologic diagnoses of HCC, progression on/intolerance to sorafenib, Child-Pugh A disease and ECOG PS 0-1. Pts were randomized 2:1 to Pembro 200 mg+ BSC or placebo (Pbo) + BSC IV every 3 wk, stratified by geographic region, MVI and AFP levels for ≥35 cycles or until confirmed PD/unacceptable toxicity. Response was assessed every 6 wk (RECIST v1.1, central imaging review). Co-primary endpoints were OS and PFS. Secondary endpoints were ORR, DOR and safety. Data cutoff: OS, final analysis (Jan 2 2019); PFS, first interim (Mar 26 2018) and final analyses. Results: 413 patients were randomized (278 to Pembro,135 to Pbo). After a median follow up of 13.8 mo, 10.1% of pts remained on Pembro, 3.0% on Pbo. Pembro improved OS (HR 0.781, 95% CI 0.611-0.998; one sided p=0.0238) and PFS (HR 0.775, 95% CI 0.609-0.987; one sided p=0.0186 [first interim] and 0.718, 95% CI 0.570-0.904; one sided p=0.0022 [final analysis]) vs Pbo; differences in OS at final and PFS at first interim analyses did not meet significance per the prespecified statistical plan. ORR (95% CI) was 18.3% (14.0-23.4%) and 4.4% (1.6-9.4%) for Pembro vs Pbo at final analysis (one sided p=0.00007); Pembro responses were durable (median DOR: 13.8 mo [1.5+ - 23.6+]). Off study, anticancer therapy use was 42% for Pembro and 47% for Pbo. Safety profile including incidence of hepatitis and other immune mediated events was generally consistent with that previously reported for Pembro; no HBV/HCV flares were identified. Conclusion: Pembro reduced the risk of death by 22% and improved PFS vs Pbo in pts with advanced HCC, but significance did not meet prespecified statistical criteria. ORR for Pembro was consistent with that of KEYNOTE-224. New anticancer therapy in the Pbo arm likely impacted OS. The safety profile was comparable to that established for Pembro monotherapy. The results are consistent with those of KEYNOTE-224, further supporting second line therapy with Pembro in HCC pts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Finn, R. S., Ryoo, B.-Y., Merle, P., Kudo, M., Bouattour, M., Lim, H.-Y., … Cheng, A.-L. (2019). Pembrolizumab (Pembro) therapy vs best supportive care (BSC) in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): KEYNOTE-240. Annals of Oncology, 30, iv135–iv136. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz154.026

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free