Endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms in high-surgical-risk patients using commercially available stent-grafts

5Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the initial and long-term results of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in high-surgical-risk patients (i.e., age ≥80 years, serum creatinine level ≥3 mg/dL, severe pulmonary dysfunction, severe cardiac dysfunction). Methods: From April 2002 to June 2009, 50 consecutive high-surgical-risk patients (42 men; mean age 74.0±8.7, range 54-91) with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA; mean diameter 64.8 mm) who were treated electively using a bifurcated aortic endograft (32 Excluder, 18 Zenith) were entered in a prospective registry. Thirty-five (70%) patients were classified ASA III and 15 (30%) were ASA IV. High-risk status was corroborated using the Customized Probability Index (CPI). Primary endpoints were operative mortality and long-term survival; secondary endpoints were the frequency of reintervention, evolution of the aneurysm sac, and rates of primary and secondary patency and rupture. Results: The mean CPI score was 11.04±6.3. Operative mortality was 2% (1/50). There were 4 endoleaks, 1 case of endotension, and 1 endograft limb occlusion. Two patients required reintervention during the mean follow-up of 35.6 months. Survival at 3 years was 94%. Primary and secondary patency rates at 3 years were 98% and 100%, respectively. There were no ruptures. Conclusion: Initial and long-term results with endovascular treatment of AAA in high-surgical-risk patients were satisfactory and appear to justify this approach in this patient population. © 2010 by the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mendonça, C. T., De Carvalho, C. A., Weingärtner, J., Shiomi, A. Y., & Costa, D. S. D. M. (2010). Endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms in high-surgical-risk patients using commercially available stent-grafts. Journal of Endovascular Therapy, 17(1), 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1583/09-2872.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free