Using Visual Risk Assessment to Uncover Subtle Team Performance Issues

  • Taylor P
  • Coleman G
  • McDaid K
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A number of recent surveys of Web development have revealed that typical project timeframes are of the order of 3 months. This chapter reports the findings of a field study conducted in Ireland which set out to contribute towards a better understanding of the nature of high-speed Web development practices. Qualitative interview data was gathered from 14 interviewees, purposefully selected from a variety of different organisations and backgrounds. This data was then analysed using the Grounded Theory method, and ten core dimensions were revealed: (1) the role of collaborative groupware tools; (2) collective code ownership; (3) timeframe driven by business imperatives; (4) enablers of productivity; (5) quality "satisficing"; (6) requirements clarity; (7) process maturity; (8) collectively agreed project schedules; (9) closeness to client; and (10) working software over documentation. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Taylor, P. S., Coleman, G., McDaid, K., Keenan, F., & Bustard, D. (2009). Using Visual Risk Assessment to Uncover Subtle Team Performance Issues. In Information Systems Development (pp. 15–23). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68772-8_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free