Are We Studying Non-Coding RNAs Correctly? Lessons from nc886

14Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), such as microRNAs or long ncRNAs, have brought about a new paradigm in the regulation of gene expression. Sequencing technologies have detected transcripts with tremendous sensitivity and throughput and revealed that the majority of them lack protein-coding potential. Myriad articles have investigated numerous ncRNAs and many of them claim that ncRNAs play gene-regulatory roles. However, it is questionable whether all these articles draw conclusions through cautious gain-and loss-of function experiments whose design was reason-ably based on an ncRNA’s correct identity and features. In this review, these issues are discussed with a regulatory ncRNA, nc886, as an example case to represent cautions and guidelines when studying ncRNAs.

References Powered by Scopus

MicroRNAs: Target Recognition and Regulatory Functions

17465Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14

10771Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors

6260Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Emerging roles of tRNA-derived small RNAs in cancer biology

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Pol III transcriptome: Basic features, recurrent patterns, and emerging roles in cancer

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Role of Hydrogen Sulfide (H<inf>2</inf>S) in Epigenetic Regulation of Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, Y. S. (2022, April 1). Are We Studying Non-Coding RNAs Correctly? Lessons from nc886. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23084251

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

80%

Researcher 2

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 3

43%

Immunology and Microbiology 2

29%

Chemistry 1

14%

Neuroscience 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free